Accountability Education Reform Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Standardized Testing

What’s In the ESSA About Accountability?

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Here is a report from the Washington Post on the accountability features of the Every Student Succeeds Act.

 

“Specifically, under the Every Student Succeeds Act:

 

“The testing regime remains in place.

 

“States would still be required, as they are now, to test students annually in math and reading in grades 3 through 8 and once in high school, and publicly report the scores according to race, income, ethnicity, disability and whether students are English-language learners.
“States get to set their own academic goals.

“Where No Child Left Behind set forth one goal for the nation — 100 percent proficiency in math and reading by 2014 — the new bill would require each state to set and measure progress toward its own academic goals.
“Test scores still matter, but how much is up to the states. States would be charged with designing systems for judging schools. Each system would have to include measures of academic progress, including test scores, graduation rates and (for non-native English speakers) English language acquisition. But it would also have to include a measure of school climate, such as student engagement or access to advanced courses. All of the academic indicators together must count for “much” more than the non-academic factor, but the definition of “much” is not clear.
“What should be done in schools that are struggling will be up to states and districts. Under No Child Left Behind, a school could get dinged if just one of its subgroups failed to meet annual testing goals, and the federal government exercised a lot of say in what happened in persistently failing schools. Under the new bill, it’s likely that fewer schools will be required to be marked for interventions, and it’s up to states and, in many cases, districts to decide what to do to improve those schools. Schools marked for the most intensive interventions would be those among the lowest-performing 5 percent in the state, those in which fewer than two-thirds of students graduate on time, and those in which a subgroup of students “consistently underperforms.” It’s up to each state to determine how long a group of students would have to lag before the school would be required to take action.
“What happens if lots of kids opt out of testing?

“Again, it’s up to the state. Under No Child Left Behind, a school automatically got a black eye if it failed to test at least 95 percent of its eligible students. The aim was to ensure that principals and teachers weren’t discouraging low performers from showing up on test day in order to boost scores. The new bill maintains the 95 percent requirement, but states can decide how participation rates should figure into their overall school rating system.”

 

 

Related posts

Elizabeth Kolbert: The New Age of Philanthropy and the Crisis of Democracy

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

NY Post Investigates Missing Test Questions

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

DeVos and Mnuchin Sued for Seizing Tax Refunds of Student Debtors

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

News: Ohio Wasted Millions in Federal Funding on Charters that Never Opened and on Very Low-Performing Charters

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Tom Ultican: The Denver Portfolio Model Is a Failure

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Testing Corporations Spend Millions to Lobby Congress and State Legislatures

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

The Morning After

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Carl J. Petersen: Watch Nick Melvoin Give Away Public Facilities to the Charter Industry

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Here Comes “Personalized Learning”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment