Bill Gates Charter Schools Funding Gates Foundation Supporting public schools Washington State

Wayne Au: Overturning Washington State’s Charter Law, Based on ALEC Model, Is a Victory for Public Schools Everywhere

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, explains why the Washington Supreme Court declared charter schools unconstitutional and why this decision has national implications.

The Court’s decision, he writes, was a “major rebuke” to the charter industry (and to Seattle’s richest resident, Bill Gates, who plunked millions into the 2012 referendum allowing charter schools, which passed by 50.69% of the vote).

At the heart of the Washington State’s Supreme Court ruling was the idea that charter schools, as defined by the law, were not actually “public schools.” The key issue is this: Washington State’s constitution has a provision that only “common schools” receive tax dollars allocated for public education. The law in Washington State is structured so that charter schools are governed at both the school level and state level by an appointed board, not an elected one. As such, charter schools in Washington State would receive public monies without any guarantee of accountability to any democratically elected, public body. The Washington State Supreme Court decided that this lack of public oversight of charter schools meant that did not meet the definition of “common schools” and therefore are not eligible to receive public monies made available for public schools.

Au was a plaintiff in the lawsuit; before that, he frequently spoke and wrote about the dangers that privately managed charter schools pose to public education. He understood that they are a precursor to privatization and a direct threat to community responsibility for public schools for all children.

As background, he points out that the Washington Supreme Court had previously ordered the legislature to fully fund the state’s public schools and is fining the legislature $100,000 a day for its failure to do so (since August 15).

Charter school supporters are furious about the Court’s decision and are now trying to persuade the legislature to create a separate funding stream for charter schools. Au asks how this make sense: Why should the legislature create a separate fund for charters enrolling 1,300 students when it has not properly funded public schools enrolling 1 MILLION students?

Related posts

Doris Fisher of the Gap: A Billionaire Funding the Privatization of Public Education

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Peter Greene: Beware DFER’s Phony Poll about Democrats and Charter Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jeff Bryant: Dems Must Fight Fight Betsy DeVos

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Wisconsin: Governor Evers Seeks to Freeze Voucher Enrollments and Charter Expansion

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Network for Public Education Vows to Carry Fight Against DeVos to Senate Floor!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New Orleans: 25% of Students are “Chronically Absent”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jeff Bryant: Why Democrats Should Unite For a Charter Moratorium

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Mercedes Schneider: Tracing the Origins of an Educational MoneyMaker

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

A Grand Bargain: Reopen the Schools (Where Feasible) But Only If the Feds Pay for It

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment