Accountability Elections Trump

Wall Street Journal: Time for Trump to Concede

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

The Wall Street Journal is one of the most conservative editorial voices in the nation. Today its editorial says that the Electoral College has decided the election. Biden won. Trump lost. Trump should concede.

The Electoral College meets Monday to cast its votes for President, officially marking Joe Biden as the election winner. President Trump’s legal challenges have run their course, and he and the rest of the Republican Party can help the country and themselves by acknowledging the result and moving on.

Mr. Trump’s last legal gasp came Friday evening when the Supreme Court declined to hear the Texas lawsuit seeking to overturn the election results in Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. As we predicted, the Court cited Texas’s lack of legal standing to challenge how another state manages its elections. 

Some on the right claim that Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented, but this is wrong. The Justices said they would have taken the Texas case as a “bill of complaint” when states sue other states. 

This is a technical point that concerns the Court’s case management, and the two Justices have a long-time view that the Court should hear more of these direct state appeals. We happen to agree, but in this case the Texas claim was outside constitutional bounds. Justice Alito (joined by Justice Thomas) added that he would “not grant other relief.” This was not a dissent on the merits of the Texas claim.

Mr. Trump and his camp are attacking the Court, and the President is deriding the “standing” point as a dodge. It is much more than that. Limits on standing are fundamental to a conservative understanding of the proper judicial role under Article III of the Constitution. If anyone can sue without a cognizable injury and the possibility of remedy, the courts would be overwhelmed with frivolous claims.

There is more to the editorial but I don’t subscribe and this is the free content available to me. Note: Even if Alito and Thomas had dissented, which they did not, the vote would have been a decisive 7-2 against Trump’s frivolous claim. It was 9-0 against Trump’s frivolous claim. At what point do courts begin to fine and punish lawyers for repeatedly filing frivolous claims?

Related posts

Panel of Scholars at NPE Conference: Betsy DeVos is Wrong About Choice!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

North Carolina: State Officials Are Embarrassed by Facts about their Charter Sector

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Sue M. Legg: The Failure of Jeb Bush’s A+ Plan in Florida

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Reagan Foundation Asks Trump Campaign to Stop Using Reagan’s Name

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

The Most Important Post You Will Read This Week: The Reclusive Tycoon Who Financed the Alt-Right and Trump

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Join the National Town Hall to Learn About Canceling Testing This Spring

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Trump Finally Finds an A-List Singer for His Inauguration

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Christine Langhoff: The Real Goal of Question 2 in Massachusetts

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Arizona: What a Joke! Gov. Ducey Wants to Reform Charter Law!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment