Privatization Propaganda School Choice Supporting public schools

Speduktr: We All Pay for Public Services and Public Goods, for Our Common Benefit

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

The privatization movement is built on the ideology of “a backpack full of cash.” Give the money to the family and let them spend it where and how they want. The money is not actually in the child’s backpack, but handed out to families to spend as they wish. If they want their child to attend a religious school or a private school or a for-profit school or a virtual charter school or home school, here is a voucher worth $5,000.

This approach discounts the obligation of the community and society to provide certain basic goods and services that are available to everyone. We have public beaches, public parks, public transportation, police, firefighters, and other goods and services that are the responsibility of government. We pay taxes to maintain public schools, even if we don’t have children ourselves. We pay taxes to maintain public schools, even if our own children are grown and are no long in school. We pay taxes to maintain public schools, even if our own children attended private schools. That’s what a community does to make sure every child is educated. It is the job of the polity to assure that all public schools have equitable and adequate resources.

The “bait and switch” of the school choice is to individualize the social obligation and turn it into a consumer choice. This is a deceptive way of evading society’s obligation to ensure that every school, wherever it is located, has equitable and adequate resources. All schools should have the resources they need for the children they serve: well-tended buildings, a library with up-to-date technology, a full arts program, experienced teachers, small classes, a curriculum that includes history, science, civics, mathematics, literature and foreign languages.

But some very rich people don’t like paying taxes so poor kids can have what their children have, and they have persuaded many legislators to buy into the hoax of school choice. Persuasion takes the form of campaign contributions, and they are very generous with their efforts to evade taxes that serve the good of all.

This reader explains:

I just don’t get why it is so hard to get the message across that we are not purchasing our own child’s education, we are providing a public good that educates all children. We are not buying the right to use roads or police and fire services, we are participating in the funding of those common goods for the entire community.

This situation points out the importance of avoiding public/private partnerships or at least structuring them much differently (to avoid huge tax write-offs). If everyone pays their taxes, the needs of the community will be met through that common collection. When private sources get to direct what happens, that means the common good has been sabotaged. No private entity should be dictating what the common good will be.

Related posts

Mitchell Robinson: How to Make America Great

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New York: Parent Opt-Out Leaders Target Legislators Who Oppose Public Education in their Own Districts

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Wisconsin: Governor Evers Seeks to Freeze Voucher Enrollments and Charter Expansion

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Thomas Ultican: The Manufactured Disaster that Crushed the Oakland Public Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Tim Slekar: Charter Schools Are Not Public Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

California: Thurmond and Newsom Put the Fox in Charge of the Henhouse

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

For Your Browsing Pleasure: Who Got Walton Money for Education Disruption in 2018?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

When Jennifer Berkshire (AKA EduShyster) Met Lisa Alva, Candidate for LAUSD School Board

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

John Merrow: Which Side Are You On? Whose Side Are You On?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment