Charter Schools Education Industry Funding Inequity Injustice

New York Times: Readers Respond to Charter Debate

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

You may recall that sociologist and author Eve Ewing wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times that said it was time to end the debate about charter schools and celebrate all good schools, whatever they are called. This is one of the talking points of the charter industry, which prefers the public not to notice how many charter schools close every year, how many are low-performing, and how many are run by non-educators who turn a handsome profit.

My response was here.

The New York Times published letters to the editor about the Ewing article. Only one was favorable, written by Jeanne Allen, who runs a charter advocacy organization called the “Center for Education Reform,” funded by rightwing billionaires and Wall Street financiers. CER promotes all kinds of school choice and is hostile to public schools.

The first letter was written by Denis Smith of Ohio, who has appeared on this blog:

To the Editor:

Re “End the Fight Over Charter Schools,” by Eve L. Ewing (Op-Ed, Feb. 23):

Why do we allow two separate but seemingly parallel systems of education, using scarce public funds that are taken from traditional public schools to fund charters, a seeming experiment gone awry? Why do we allow one entity that is accountable and has governance conveyed from the voters in each community and allow the other to avoid the same transparency and accountability?

Here in Ohio, charters are exempt from 150 sections of law that the public schools must be in compliance with to legally operate, yet the public schools are required to support charters with the school district’s transportation system and other services at no cost.

So no, we can’t stop fighting about the subject of charters until we have the same rules for both. If one is exempt from wholesale sections of the law, then by definition it is not a public school but something else, a school that acquires public funds to operate yet has its own rules and is free from much oversight.

Denis D. Smith
Westerville, Ohio
The writer, a charter school critic, is a former consultant in the Ohio Department of Education’s charter school office, responsible for assuring legal compliance in the operations of these schools.

Related posts

Tom Ultican: Who Should Be the Next Leader of California Schools? A Banker or a Social Worker?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Michigan: Leaders of Failing Charter Sector Will Meet to Celebrate Themselves as “Innovators”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Peter Greene: Nine Things You Should Know about School Choice

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Waltons Are Shamefully Targeting Black Communities with Privatization Promises

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

A Billionaire Stops Funding Charters and TFA, Starts Funding Public Schools!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

North Carolina: GOP Legislators Transfer Funds from Public Schools to Charter Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Keith E. Benson: What Reformers Are Really Doing in Camden and Other Urban Districts

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New Mexico: Charter Founder Sentenced to Five Years in Prison for Stealing Millions

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Arkansas: Inside the Shadowy World of the School “Choice” Movement, Part 2

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment