Charter Schools Education Industry Funding Inequity Injustice

New York Times: Readers Respond to Charter Debate

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

You may recall that sociologist and author Eve Ewing wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times that said it was time to end the debate about charter schools and celebrate all good schools, whatever they are called. This is one of the talking points of the charter industry, which prefers the public not to notice how many charter schools close every year, how many are low-performing, and how many are run by non-educators who turn a handsome profit.

My response was here.

The New York Times published letters to the editor about the Ewing article. Only one was favorable, written by Jeanne Allen, who runs a charter advocacy organization called the “Center for Education Reform,” funded by rightwing billionaires and Wall Street financiers. CER promotes all kinds of school choice and is hostile to public schools.

The first letter was written by Denis Smith of Ohio, who has appeared on this blog:

To the Editor:

Re “End the Fight Over Charter Schools,” by Eve L. Ewing (Op-Ed, Feb. 23):

Why do we allow two separate but seemingly parallel systems of education, using scarce public funds that are taken from traditional public schools to fund charters, a seeming experiment gone awry? Why do we allow one entity that is accountable and has governance conveyed from the voters in each community and allow the other to avoid the same transparency and accountability?

Here in Ohio, charters are exempt from 150 sections of law that the public schools must be in compliance with to legally operate, yet the public schools are required to support charters with the school district’s transportation system and other services at no cost.

So no, we can’t stop fighting about the subject of charters until we have the same rules for both. If one is exempt from wholesale sections of the law, then by definition it is not a public school but something else, a school that acquires public funds to operate yet has its own rules and is free from much oversight.

Denis D. Smith
Westerville, Ohio
The writer, a charter school critic, is a former consultant in the Ohio Department of Education’s charter school office, responsible for assuring legal compliance in the operations of these schools.

Related posts

Florida Legislature Considering Charter Bill for More Charters, More Accountability

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

SomeDam Poet: “No Democrat Will Vote”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Bernie Sanders Blasts Center for American Progress for Undermining Progressive Candidates

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Ohio: More $ for Charters, Public Schools Get Budget Cut

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Vasquez Heilig: How Does the Public Feel About “Choice”?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jersey Jazzman’s Final Post about Hoboken: Let’s Have an Honest Conversation

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

A Graphic Explanation: Why Corporations Want Our Public Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

This Shouldn’t Bother Me, But It Does: The Education Marketplace

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

North Carolina: NAACP Threatens to Sue to Block New Charter Law and Voter ID Law

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment