Accountability Bias Bigotry Charter Schools Education Industry Privatization School Choice Vouchers

National Education Policy Center: How School Choice Paves the Way for Discrimination

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

The National Education Policy Center released a report showing how school choice facilitates discrimination that is prohibited in public schools. There should be a basic principle for all publicly-funded schools, whether they are public schools, charter schools, or voucher schools: Where public money goes, public accountability must follow. Public money should not tolerate bigotry against students or staff of any kind.

When Publicly Funded Schools Exclude Segments of the Public

Key Takeaway: Policy brief analyzes discriminatory practices and possible legal protections in an era of education privatization.

NEPC Publication: http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/privatization

Contact:
William J. Mathis: (802) 383-0058, [email protected] Julie F. Mead: (608) 263-3405, [email protected]

In Indiana, a private religious school receiving over $6.5 million in public funds via the state’s voucher program placed an LGBT counselor on leave because she had married her same-sex partner.

In Milwaukee, where students with disabilities constitute 12-20% of public school enrollments, they constitute only 2% of enrollments in private schools participating in the city’s voucher program. Similarly, charter schools enroll a lower percentage of students with disabilities (particularly more severe disabilities) when compared to traditional public schools. In response to these and other issues of access and discrimination, some defenders of these schools have argued that the schools have broken no laws—and they are often
correct. How can this be?

To answer that question, professors Julie F. Mead of the University of Wisconsin and Suzanne E. Eckes of Indiana University authored a policy brief, titled How School Privatization Opens the Door for Discrimination, which analyzes discrimination in an era of education privatization.

The brief’s review of relevant laws reveals that voucher and charter school programs open the
door to discrimination because of three phenomena.

First, federal law defines discrimination differently in public and private spaces.

Second, state legislatures have largely neglected issues of discrimination while constructing voucher laws; charter laws are better, but they fail to comprehensively address these issues.

Third, because private and charter schools are free to determine what programs to offer, they can attract some populations while excluding others.

After briefly examining the history of discrimination in schools, the brief analyzes each of these
three enabling factors and then outlines recent developments.

Finally, based on its analyses, the brief offers the following recommendations to help address the issue of publicly funded programs currently failing to serve all segments of the public:

1. Congress should amend federal anti-discrimination laws to clarify that states supporting charter schools and states directly or indirectly channeling public funds to private schools must ensure that those programs operate in non-discriminatory ways.

2. Federal agencies should explore whether governmental benefits should be withheld from private schools failing to meet non-discrimination standards.

3. State legislatures should include explicit anti-discrimination language in their state voucher laws to ensure that participating private schools do not discriminate against students and staff on the basis of race, color, sex, race, class, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, ethnicity, national origin, or primary language.

4. State legislatures should adopt or amend charter school laws to ensure that policies and practices are reviewed throughout the process of approval and renewal. Schools failing to attract and retain reasonably heterogeneous student populations should be directed to address the problem and should be considered for non-renewal if the problem is not corrected.

Find How School Privatization Opens the Door for Discrimination, by Julie F. Mead and Suzanne E. Eckes, at:
http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/privatization

This policy brief was made possible in part by the support of the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice (greatlakescenter.org).

The National Education Policy Center (NEPC), housed at the University of Colorado Boulder School of Education, produces and disseminates high-quality, peer-reviewed research to inform education policy discussions. Visit us at: http://nepc.colorado.edu

Related posts

David Kristofferson: What Everyone Needs to Know about AP Exams

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Steven Singer: Charters Are Gobbling Up My Public School District

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

California: Charter Leaders Charged with Breaking Securities Law; No Criminal Charges

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Pennsylvania: Speaker of the House Who Hates Public Schools and Teachers Will Have Electoral Challenge

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

More on Stand for Children’s Epic Failure in Tennessee

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Attention, Parents! A Statement on EdTech from the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

A Student in Kansas Writes about How Standardized Testing Makes Her Feel

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

EduShyster: Why Teachers at a Cleveland Charter School Formed a Union

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Three Billionaires Are Trying to Buy the School Board in Oakland, California

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment