Common Core Missouri Testing

Missouri Judge Blocks Payment to Common Core Connsortium

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Duane Swacker says:

From one of the plaintiffs blog:

http://www.fredsauermatrix.com/fred-sauer-prevails-in-common-core-suit-against-gov-nixon/

Fred Sauer Prevails in Common Core Suit Against Gov. Nixon

Date February 25, 2015

Posted by molly

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Contact: (314) 854-1305
Missouri Court Rules That the “Interstate Consortium” Implementing Common Core Assessments Is Unconstitutional

Jefferson City, Missouri. On February 24, 2015, the Circuit Court for Cole County, Missouri ruled in favor of Missouri taxpayer plaintiffs Fred N. Sauer, Anne Gassel, and Gretchen Logue in their constitutional challenge to one of two interstate entities charged with implementing Common Core.

The Court blocked the payment of $4.3 million of Missouri taxpayer funds as membership fees to the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium, an interstate organization that is implementing tests aligned to the Common Core State Standards (“Common Core”).

The Court’s Judgment states: “The Court finds that the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium . . . is an unlawful interstate compact to which the U.S. Congress has never consented, whose existence and operation violate the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 10, cl. 3, as well as numerous federal statutes; and that Missouri’s participation in the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium as a member is unlawful under state and federal law.”

Plaintiff Fred N. Sauer stated: “The Court’s judgment recognizes the reality that the interstate ‘consortia’ charged with writing and implementing the tests aligned with Common Core are, and have always been, unconstitutional interstate compacts. Missouri should not be a member of such an illegal entity.”

The Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that “No State shall, without the consent of Congress … enter into any Agreement or Compact with any other State.” In their lawsuit, Sauer, Gassel, and Logue contended that the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium is an unconstitutional compact because (1) it undermines the authority of the U.S. Congress, which has passed numerous federal statutes forbidding the establishment of a national curriculum; (2) it threatens the sovereignty of member States by forcing them to cede some of their control over educational policy within their borders to an interstate entity; and (3) it threatens the sovereignty of non-member States by seeking to create an educational “cartel” aligned with Common Core.

Related posts

Do Teachers Have Free Speech Rights?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

David Berliner: Kids Missing School? Don’t Worry.

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leonie Haimson on the Political Use and Misuse of Test Scores

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Nancy Bailey: If Only Students Could Sue Betsy DeVos and the Corporate Reformers for the Damage They Have Done

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

What Is HANY and Who Funds Them?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Laura Chapman: Aaron Churchill, Minister of Information for Privatization in Ohio

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Preschool Teacher: Let the Children Play

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Teacher: We Are Pawns in Someone Else’s Game

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Help NPE-Action Keep Score on the 2020 Presidential Candidates

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment