Betsy DeVos Billionaires Charter Schools Education Reform Funding Home Schooling School Choice Vouchers

Maurice Cunningham: Why is the Press Uninterested in the Corporate Invasion of Public Education?

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Readers of this blog have followed the advance of privatization of public school funding for nearly a decade. We know the big foundations and individuals that support privatization. We have followed their activities and watched as all of their strategies have failed to match their promises. The great puzzle, to me, is the indifference of the mainstream media. While they cover political scandals of every variety, they are just not interested in the sustained campaign to divert public money to schools there privately managed,to religious schools, to other private schools, and even to homeschooling. The media rightly criticized Betsy DeVos’s crusade for school choice, but as soon as she left office, they lost interest in the issue. Meanwhile, red states are rushing to open more charter schools and fund more vouchers.

Maurice Cunningham explored this issue in a recent post on the blog of the MassPoliticsProfs. He chastises the Boston Globe, but the same complaint could be directed to most mainstream media.

He begins:

Suppose WalMart swept into Boston and spent millions to acquire Market Basket. The town would go ballistic. It would be covered every day in every media outlet, front page of the Boston Globe. But the Walton Family Foundation of Arkansas—the exact same heartless* mercenaries—spends millions of dollars to take over public schools and it gets ignored. Why is that?

He discusses “Hidden Politics” and “the Politics of Pretending.” He has written frequently about astroturf groups and how they present themselves to a gullible media as authentic spokesmen for parents or for some other groups.

That’s the PR facade, he says. What really matters is: who is funding these groups? Why doesn’t the media care?

I always thought that if out-of-state billionaires could be proven to have entered the state using local fronts to change Massachusetts education policy that would be a great, great, great story. I’ve been proven wrong again, and again, and again. I still think it’s a great story, it’s just a great story that only gets told at a small political science blog. Why is that?

Why is that?

Related posts

Arizona: Voters Reject Vouchers by 2-1 Margin!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Carl Petersen: The Shocking Decision by the LAUSD Not to Renew Five Charter Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

California Democratic Party: Charters Should Have Elected Boards

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Read the Full Complaint by Parents Against Success Academy Charters

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Missouri: Professor of Economics Renounces Award to Protest Donor Influence

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

BREAKING: Chicago Students Occupy Symphony Center to Protest Rauner’s Budget Cuts and Inaction

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Mike Klonsky: “Reformers” Throw in the Towel on Fighting Segregation and Poverty

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

EduShyster: Why Teachers at a Cleveland Charter School Formed a Union

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Dutch Historian Tells Davos Elite That Biggest World Problem is Failure of Rich to Pay Taxes

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment