Administrators Charter Schools Connecticut Corporate Reform superintendents

Jon Pelto: Connecticut Gov. Malloy and the Politics of Appeasement

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Jon Pelto is shocked that Democratic legislators in Connecticut are afraid to confront Governor Dannel Malloy. The governor vetoed a bill that would establish qualifications for the State Commissioner of Education.

Despite their overwhelming–almost total–support for the legislation, the legislature refuses to override the Governor’s veto. This leaves the Governor free to hire another inept and politically motivated superintendent who is in the pocket of the super-rich charter industry.

Pelto writes:

“In preparation for the Connecticut General Assembly’s 2015 constitutionally required veto session, Democratic legislative leaders announced yesterday that no votes would be taken on whether to sustain or override the nine bills vetoed by Democratic Governor Dannel Malloy during this year’s legislative session.

“The most noteworthy of the bills that the Democrats are unwilling to bring up for a vote is PA 15-176, which was House Bill 6977, AN ACT ESTABLISHING QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION.

“The legislation requires that any person serving as Connecticut’s Commissioner of Education have an appropriate education degree and teaching experience.

“The legislation arose in response to Governor Malloy’s decision to name Stefan Pryor, a charter school founder and corporate education reform industry advocate, to be his first commissioner of education, despite the fact that Pryor had no educational experience.

“Stefan Pryor’s performance as Malloy’s Education Commissioner led both Democrats and Republicans to call for legislation requiring future leaders of the state department of education to have the requisite education experience.

“The General Assembly’s Education Committee held a public hearing on House Bill #6977 and went on to pass the legislation by a vote of 32 – 0.

“At no time did Malloy or his administration testify against the bill or publicly announce any opposition to the concept.

“The bill went to pass the Connecticut State Senate by a vote of 36 – 0 and the Connecticut House of Representatives by a vote of 138-5.

“In the end, only one Democratic legislator voted against the bill.

“With its passage, HB6977 become Connecticut Public Act 15-176.

“But despite the overwhelming level of support displayed for the bill by the Connecticut General Assembly, Governor Malloy vetoed the legislation.”

Related posts

My Critique of Governor Cuomo’s “Reform” Agenda: It Will Harm Students, Teachers, and Public Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

NEPC: 21 Myths About Charter Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Ohio: Denis Smith Explains the Charter Movement: Part 3

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

A Mississippi View of Charter Schools

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Baker and Weber: The Full Story About Charters in Newark

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Celebrated California Charter School Implodes in Dissension

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Ultra-Conservative Oregon Mogul Funds Charter School Takeover District in North Carolina

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Betsy DeVos Floods North Carolina with Charter Cash

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Ohio: Charter Leader Going to Jail

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment