Accountability Charter Schools Education Industry Harlem Success Academy Privatization

George Joseph: The “Got to Go” List Goes International

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Success Academy’s public relations firm (Mercury LLC) must be working overtime to try to outrun the stories about the charter chain’s tactics. While critics have alleged for years that the chain produces high scores by a combination of suspensions, attrition, and high-pressure test-prep, the mainstream media–led by the New York Times– is now all over the story.

 

George Joseph writes in the Guardian (U.K.) about Eva Moskowitz’s “got to go” list–the kids who need to be suspended and pushed out to protect the brand and the other allegations swirling around the high-test-score boasting charter chain.

 

Joseph writes:

 

A Guardian analysis has found that the school system loses children between the third and fourth grade, the first two years of New York state testing, at a rate four times that of neighboring public schools. Success lost more than 10% of its enrolled student population from grade to grade, compared to the average rate of 2.7% at public schools in the same building or nearby during the same years.

 

The analysis compared Success and traditional public school populations in high poverty neighborhoods and therefore excluded data from one Success Academy site on the Upper West Side where only about 25% of students were classified as “economically disadvantaged”. This school’s relatively well-to-do student population features the only example of a Success Academy class that grew in size from second to fourth grade.

 

According to Jeff Jacobs, a researcher at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs, chance alone cannot adequately account for these enrollment drop differences. “Within testing years, the enrollment drop rate observed at Success Academy is greater than the enrollment drop rates at next door public schools 70% of the time. Furthermore, in 61% of these cases, this difference is so large that we can reject the hypothesis that it occurred due to random variation in attrition rates, at the 5% significance level.”

 

Eva believes that the media is piling on, but she has made herself and her charters a media sensation. Once you set yourself up as the sine qua non of “excellence,” a model of the perfection that can be attained by everyone, you also set yourself up as a target for skeptics. The biggest problem for SA is not its critics, who could be easily ignored, but the former teachers and parents and administrators who spill the beans.

 

 

Related posts

Detroit: Children with Autism are 22 Times More Likely to Attend a Public School than a Charter School

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Jack Hassard: Governor Nathan Deal’s Very Bad Deal for Georgia’s Struggling Schools: Privatize Them

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Oklahoma: Teachers Edge Closer to Statewide Strike, With an Eye to West Virginia

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Norm Scott: Eva Moskowitz as Nurse Ratched?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

What We Learned from the NPE-Schott Foundation Report on Privatization of Public Funds

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

EdWeek: Do Children of Color Need Harsh Discipline to Succeed in School?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Detroit: NLRB Rules Charter TFA Has Right to Join Union

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Center for Popular Democracy: Charter School Vulnerabilities to Waste, Fraud, and Abuse

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Superintendents to Tech Vendors: “Just Stop It!”

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment