California Charter Schools Democracy Education Reform Funding

California: Unbridled Charter Expansion Threatens Public Schools

Interesting essay samples and examples on: https://essays.io/dissertation-examples-samples/

Thomas Ultican, teacher of physics and mathematics in San Diego, California, writes about the disastrous impact of charter schools on public schools. According to a study commissioned by the United Teachers of Los Angeles, the district loses $500 million annually to charters.

 

The charter lobby in the state–led by the California Charter School Association– is wealthy and politically powerful.

 

Ultican points to Prop 39, passed into law in 2000, as the mechanism that allows privately managed, lightly regulated charters to expand into public space and gobble up resources and the students they want.

 

“The MGT study illustrates how charter school law in California is fashioned to favor privately operated charter schools over public schools. If a local community passed a bond measure in the 1980’s to build a new public school, it is the law in California that the members of that local community – who still might be paying for that public school – will have no choice but to allow a private operator move into the facility. In addition, the charter school law requires the local school district to incur many direct and indirect costs to support charter schools.

 

“In California, since its statehood, a super-majority (67%) was required to pass a school bond measure. In 2000, after losing an effort that March to mitigate the super-majority rules and the infamous proposition 13 limitations, supporters brought forward proposition 39 that would reduce school-bond super-majorities to 55% and did not seriously threaten proposition 13 protections enacted in 1978. It passed 53% to 47% in November.

 

“In the official ballot summary for proposition 39 in the November 7, 2000 election the support message was signed by Lavonne Mcbroom, President California State PTA; Jacqueline N. Antee, AARP State President; and Allan Zaremerg, President California Chamber of Commerce. The statement against the proposition was signed by Jon Coupal, Chairman Save Our Homes Committee, Vote No on Proposition 39, a Project of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association; Dean Andal, Chairman Board of Equalization, State of California; and Felicia Elkinson, Past President Council of Sacramento Senior Organizations.

 

“This proposition was a battle royal with every media source and elected official bloviating endlessly about the righteousness of their side. However, like in the official ballot measure statements, there was no discussion of the charter school co-location funding requirement in article six of the proposition.

 

“When proposition 39 is coupled with the undemocratic charter authorizing system in California, citizens lose all democratic control of their local schools. With the three levels of government having the power to authorize charter schools it is almost impossible to turn down a charter request no matter how bad the schools previous history is or how inundated a community might be with certain types of schools…..

 

“Public education run by democratic processes is a major good. The past two decades of school reform have produced nothing but negative results and profits. The more enthusiastically the corporate and billionaire driven reforms have been embraced the worse the results (see Denver, New Orleans and Washington DC). It is time to stop all new charter school authorizations in California. It is time to reject the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. It is time to embrace professional educators working democratically within local communities to restore public education in America. It is time to protect our great inherited legacy – public education – which is definitely not a privatized market driven education.”

 

 

 

Related posts

Voters in Douglas County, Colorado, Sent a Loud Message: No Vouchers!

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Privatization on the March in Oklahoma

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Kenneth Zeichner: What We Know (and Don’t Know) about Non-Traditional Teacher Education Programs

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

New Haven: Charter School Principal Resigns After Video Released

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Gary Rubinstein: How Could TFA Hire a Tea Party Member to Lead in Nashville?

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Carol Burris: How Mike Pence Expanded Indiana’s Corrupt and Ineffective Voucher Program

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Angie Sullivan: Why Nevada Ranks Last in the Nation

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

The False Metrics of the Bloomberg-Klein Regime

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

David Gamberg: The Absurdity of Evaluating Teachers by the Scores of Students They Never Taught

V4tgDpeDBhQGUBa7

Leave a Comment